Vera vs 11x: AI sales agents compared.
Compare Vera and 11x / Alice across outbound, research, company context, workflows, connected tools, controls, and pricing.
Comparison methodology
Published by GrowthEffect, maker of Vera. Official public sources reviewed 2026-09-16. This is not a hands-on benchmark. Recheck linked sources before purchasing.
What is 11x / Alice?
11x offers Alice for outbound and Julian for inbound work. This comparison focuses on Alice, not a combined Alice-and-Julian subscription. The documentation covers outbound research, personalization, playbooks, smart replies, a knowledge base, and connected CRM context. Alice and Julian have separate commercial models. Check annual commitment, prospect volume, API access, and enterprise controls rather than assume every capability is in the entry tier.
What is Vera?
An AI sales agent for outbound and the research, signals, pipeline, and recurring work around sales. Company Brain holds shared business context; skills capture reusable working methods. Capacity is shared across agent work. Research and complex automations consume credits too; estimated prospects reached are not guaranteed output. Connected actions depend on plan, account setup, permissions, and approvals.
Compare Alice first; scope Julian separately.
11x sells distinct digital workers. Alice is the relevant outbound comparison; Julian adds a separate inbound scope and commercial model. If your evaluation also includes calling or inbound qualification, list those requirements explicitly. Do not silently treat one Vera plan as equivalent to every product in the 11x portfolio.
Context & learning
Alice documentation includes a knowledge base and research. Compare how company updates and feedback affect subsequent work instead of assuming 11x has no retained context.
Workflows & automation
Alice supports outbound plays and sequences. CRM, API, and webhook integrations can connect work to other systems; confirm action and tier scope.
Control & approvals
11x integration documentation describes granular read/write permissions and ownership-based exclusions. Test campaign oversight alongside these connection controls.
Pricing
Official documentation lists Alice Growth from $3,750/mo billed annually, including 2,000 new prospects/month. Pro and Enterprise are custom. Julian is priced separately; confirm the final agreement with 11x. Starter $299, Growth $499, Scale $999 per month; Enterprise custom. Annual billing saves 20%. Compare credits, senders, seats, and integration access, not prospect estimates alone.
Define success before the demo.
Choose a real segment and a small, representative account set. Write down what counts as a qualified company, which roles matter, what evidence must support the approach, and which actions must wait for approval. Make existing customers, open opportunities, opt-outs, and duplicate records part of the brief. Give each vendor the same inputs and enough context to do a fair job. This is a process test, not a race to produce the largest spreadsheet.
Inspect the work, not just the result.
Review the sources behind account research, the reason for qualification, the message draft, and the proposed CRM action. Ask to see the difference between a generated draft, an approved action, an enrolled sequence, and an actual send. If the workflow fails halfway through, find out what is retried and whether the next run can duplicate an external action. Record the amount of human editing needed, not just whether the vendor can produce an output.
Test a correction and a second run.
Change one assumption after the first demonstration. For example, enterprise accounts may need a different positioning angle or a longer inactivity window. Ask where the correction is stored, who can review it, what future work it affects, and how to undo it. A product remembering a conversation is not automatically the same as a governed working method. Compare the behavior you observe and avoid assuming that any one vendor owns the idea of learning.
Compare the operating commitment.
A trial should end with a clear owner for infrastructure, deliverability, data quality, permissions, and exception handling. Request a written estimate for your intended workload, including any required connected services. Review the security material, data-processing terms, cancellation timing, and available support. If the team cannot operate the chosen motion reliably, a long feature checklist will not compensate. These are evaluation criteria, not performance findings about the products on this page.
Vera vs 11x / Alice
| What to compare | Vera | 11x / Alice |
|---|---|---|
| Primary role | AI sales agent | Alice outbound digital worker |
| Data & enrichment | Research and connected data sources | Company and lead sourcing |
| Research | Market, account, and prospect research | Deep account research and personalization |
| Outreach | Email + LinkedIn, with follow-up | Multichannel outbound plays |
| Signals | Research signals and prepare or run approved actions | Signals and trigger capabilities in platform docs |
| CRM work | Permitted CRM reads and approved writes | Native CRM sync and record permissions |
| Context & learning | Company Brain + reusable working methods | Knowledge base and CRM context |
| Recurring work | Scheduled and supported triggered agent work | Plays, sequences, API and webhooks |
| Human role | Direct, review, correct, and approve | Configure targeting, exclusions, permissions |
| Pricing model | Capacity-based plans from $299/mo | Alice Growth from $3,750/mo, annual billing |
Next steps
- Meet Vera
- Book a demo
- Security & data
- All integrations
- Vera vs Artisan AI
- Vera vs AiSDR
- Vera vs Salesforge / Agent Frank
- Vera vs Clay
- AI Sales Agent vs AI SDR
- AI Sales Agent vs Sales Automation
- Clay vs Apollo
- Clay vs ZoomInfo
- Apollo vs ZoomInfo
- Vera: Product
- Vera: Platform
- Vera: Pricing
- Vera: Integrations
- Vera: Security & data
- 11x / Alice: Alice documentation
- 11x / Alice: Integrations & permissions
- 11x / Alice: Pricing documentation